Flash For Smartphones Is Finally Here, And It Is Terrible: "Flash For Smartphones Is Finally Here, And It Is Terrible
You have successfully shared the post.
A A A
Nick Saint | May 24, 2010, 3:45 PM | 3,175 | comment 26
android logo AP
ADBE May 24 2010, 05:20 PM EDT
31.63 Change % Change
GOOG May 24 2010, 05:20 PM EDT
477.16 Change % Change
AAPL May 24 2010, 06:22 PM EDT
246.76 Change % Change
CHARTS OF THE WEEK: Google Is Activating 100,000 Android-Based Phones Daily
woman getting slapped slapping hand
11 Ways Google Just Slapped Apple
Fully-Functional Flash For Mobile Is Finally Here
Google began rolling out its new mobile operating system, Android 2.2, to Nexus One phones on Thursday, and a beta version of fully-functional Flash is available for it. But based on early reviews, Android users might not want to bother with it.
PocketNow recently put a Nexus One with Android 2.2 through a series of speed tests against an iPhone 3GS and and HTC HD2 running Opera for Windows Mobile. The Nexus One outperformed the other phones by a comfortable margin -- but only when Flash was disabled.
With Flash enabled, the Nexus One was the slowest of the three phones.
Speed isn't the only problem with Flash in Android. A snap review from Gizmodo on Thursday pointed out that it's also a huge battery drain, and outside of sites specifically optimized for mobile, isn't yet all that reliable.
In fairness, this is still a beta version of Flash. Furthermore, no one ever said bulky Flash content would run smoothly on mobile phones with no cost to performance or battery life; rather, those clamoring for Flash on the iPhone have argued that users are better off with the option. As Flash itself is improved, and as more Flash content is designed with a touchscreen in mind, it might become an option that users will actually want to exercise.
But for now, enabling Flash is probably more trouble than it's worth.
Here's a video of the speed tests:
- Sent using Google Toolbar"